Hi Ye,
BTW, if you have a chance, please squash [1/8] to [3/8] patches
into 1 patch. There is no reason to split these since these are
a local(= the same subsystem) function implementation and callers.
Thank you,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:55:35 +0800
Ye Bin <yebi...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Support print type '%pd' for print dentry's or file's name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebi...@huawei.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
> index 7d2ddbcfa377..988d68e906ad 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c
> @@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static int __trace_fprobe_create(int argc, const char
> *argv[])
> char gbuf[MAX_EVENT_NAME_LEN];
> char sbuf[KSYM_NAME_LEN];
> char abuf[MAX_BTF_ARGS_LEN];
> + char *dbuf = NULL;
> bool is_tracepoint = false;
> struct tracepoint *tpoint = NULL;
> struct traceprobe_parse_context ctx = {
> @@ -1086,6 +1087,10 @@ static int __trace_fprobe_create(int argc, const char
> *argv[])
> argv = new_argv;
> }
>
> + ret = traceprobe_expand_dentry_args(argc, argv, &dbuf);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> /* setup a probe */
> tf = alloc_trace_fprobe(group, event, symbol, tpoint, maxactive,
> argc, is_return);
> @@ -1131,6 +1136,7 @@ static int __trace_fprobe_create(int argc, const char
> *argv[])
> trace_probe_log_clear();
> kfree(new_argv);
> kfree(symbol);
> + kfree(dbuf);
> return ret;
>
> parse_error:
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhira...@kernel.org>
