On Tue Apr 2, 2024 at 8:40 PM EEST, Michal Koutný wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 11:20:21AM -0500, Haitao Huang > <haitao.hu...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Do we really want to have it implemented in c? > > I only pointed to the available C boilerplate. > > > There are much fewer lines of > > code in shell scripts. Note we are not really testing basic cgroup stuff. > > All we needed were creating/deleting cgroups and set limits which I think > > have been demonstrated feasible in the ash scripts now. > > I assume you refer to > Message-Id: <20240331174442.51019-1-haitao.hu...@linux.intel.com> > right? > > Could it be even simpler if you didn't stick to cgtools APIs and v1 > compatibility? > > Reducing ash_cgexec.sh to something like > echo 0 >$R/$1/cgroup.procs > shift > exec "$@" > (with some small builerplate for $R and previous mkdirs)
I already asked about necessity of v1 in some response, and fully support this idea. Then cgexec can simply be a function wrapping along the lines what you proposed. BR, Jarkko
