Em Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:48:18 +0200 Thorsten Leemhuis <li...@leemhuis.info> escreveu:
> Hi kernel.org helpdesk! > > Could you please create the email alias > do-not-apply-to-sta...@kernel.org which redirects all mail to /dev/null, > just like sta...@kernel.org does? > > That's an idea GregKH brought up a few days ago here: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/2024041123-earthling-primarily-4656@gregkh/ > > To quote: > > > How about: > > cc: <do-not-apply-to-sta...@kernel.org> # Reason goes here, and must be > > present > > > > and we can make that address be routed to /dev/null just like > > <sta...@kernel.org> is? > > There was some discussion about using something shorter, but in the end > there was no strong opposition and the thread ended a a few days ago. Heh, a shorter name would make it a lot easier to remember, specially since not wanting a patch to go to stable is an exception... I bet I'll never remember the right syntax, needing to look at the docs every time it would be used. IMO, something like: no-stable or nostable would do the trick and would be a lot easier to remember. Btw, IMO, it won't hurt accepting more than one variant that could be allowed, e. g. using a regular expression like: (do)?[-_]?(nt|not?).*stable at the scripts used by stable developers - and maybe at the ML server - to catch different variations won't hurt, as it sounds likely that people will end messing up with a big name like "do-not-apply-to-stable", typing instead things like: do_not_apply_to_stable dont-apply-to-stable and other variants. Just my 2 cents. Regards, Mauro
