It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave
the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when
disabling GSO.

IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.

Co-developed-by: Firo Yang <firo.y...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <iluc...@suse.de>
Tested-by: Andreas Taschner <andreas.tasch...@suse.com>
CC: Michal Kubeček <mkube...@suse.com>
CC: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au>
CC: Julian Anastasov <j...@ssi.bg>
CC: lvs-de...@vger.kernel.org
CC: netfilter-de...@vger.kernel.org
CC: net...@vger.kernel.org
CC: coret...@netfilter.org
---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c 
b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
index a0921adc31a9..3205b45ce161 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
@@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
ip_vs_protocol *pp,
        if (sctph->source != cp->vport || payload_csum ||
            skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
                sctph->source = cp->vport;
-               sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
+               if (!skb_is_gso_sctp(skb))
+                       sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
        } else {
                skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
        }
@@ -174,7 +175,8 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
ip_vs_protocol *pp,
            (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
             !(skb_dst(skb)->dev->features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC))) {
                sctph->dest = cp->dport;
-               sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
+               if (!skb_is_gso_sctp(skb))
+                       sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
        } else if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
                skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
        }
-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to