Hi Masami, On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:16:15AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:00:50 +0300 > Mike Rapoport <r...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <r...@kernel.org> > > > > kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for > > code. > > > > Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be > > enabled in non-modular kernels. > > > > Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes inside > > modules, make CONFIG_KPROBES select CONFIG_EXECMEM and drop the > > dependency of CONFIG_KPROBES on CONFIG_MODULES. > > Thanks for this work, but this conflicts with the latest fix in v6.9-rc4. > Also, can you use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) instead of #ifdefs in > function body? We have enough dummy functions for that, so it should > not make a problem.
The code in check_kprobe_address_safe() that gets the module and checks for __init functions does not compile with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES). I can pull it out to a helper or leave #ifdef in the function body, whichever you prefer. > -- > Masami Hiramatsu -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
