Hello,

On Sun, 21 Apr 2024, Ismael Luceno wrote:

> It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave
> the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when
> disabling GSO.
> 
> IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.
> 
> Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support", 2016-06-02)
> Co-developed-by: Firo Yang <firo.y...@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <iluc...@suse.de>
> Tested-by: Andreas Taschner <andreas.tasch...@suse.com>
> CC: Michal Kubeček <mkube...@suse.com>
> CC: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au>
> CC: Julian Anastasov <j...@ssi.bg>
> CC: lvs-de...@vger.kernel.org
> CC: netfilter-de...@vger.kernel.org
> CC: net...@vger.kernel.org
> CC: coret...@netfilter.org

        Looks good to me, thanks!

Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <j...@ssi.bg>

        As scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict /tmp/file.patch complains
about Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by lines you may want to
send v3...

> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     Changes since v1:
>     * Added skb_is_gso before skb_is_gso_sctp.
>     * Added "Fixes" tag.
> 
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c 
> b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> index a0921adc31a9..1e689c714127 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>       if (sctph->source != cp->vport || payload_csum ||
>           skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
>               sctph->source = cp->vport;
> -             sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
> +             if (!skb_is_gso(skb) || !skb_is_gso_sctp(skb))
> +                     sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>       } else {
>               skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>       }
> @@ -174,7 +175,8 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> ip_vs_protocol *pp,
>           (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
>            !(skb_dst(skb)->dev->features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC))) {
>               sctph->dest = cp->dport;
> -             sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
> +             if (!skb_is_gso(skb) || !skb_is_gso_sctp(skb))
> +                     sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
>       } else if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
>               skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>       }
> -- 
> 2.43.0

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <j...@ssi.bg>

Reply via email to