On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 7:14 PM Ondřej Jirman <m...@xff.cz> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 06:20:41PM GMT, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:59 PM Ondřej Jirman <m...@xff.cz> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 02:16:06AM GMT, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 1:41 AM Aren Moynihan <a...@peacevolution.org> > > > > wrote:
... > > > > > ret = stk3310_init(indio_dev); > > > > > if (ret < 0) > > > > > - return ret; > > > > > + goto err_vdd_disable; > > > > > > > > This is wrong. You will have the regulator being disabled _before_ > > > > IRQ. Note, that the original code likely has a bug which sets states > > > > before disabling IRQ and removing a handler. > > > > > > How so? stk3310_init is called before enabling the interrupt. > > > > Exactly, IRQ is registered with devm and hence the error path and > > remove stages will got it in a wrong order. > > Makes no sense. Huh?! > IRQ is not enabled here, yet. So in error path, the code will > just disable the regulator and devm will unref it later on. IRQ doesn't enter > the picture here at all in the error path. Error path _after_ IRQ handler has been _successfully_ installed. And complete ->remove() stage. > > > Original code has a bug that IRQ is enabled before registering the > > > IIO device, > > > > Indeed, but this is another bug. > > > > > so if IRQ is triggered before registration, iio_push_event > > > from IRQ handler may be called on a not yet registered IIO device. > > > > > > Never saw it happen, though. :) > > > > Because nobody cares enough to enable DEBUG_SHIRQ. > > Nice debug tool. I bet it makes quite a mess when enabled. :) FWIW, I have had it enabled for ages, but I have only a few devices, so I fixed a few cases in the past WRT shared IRQ issues. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
