On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 14:03:34 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:

> While working on the function_graph multiple users code, I realized
> that I was struggling with how the ftrace code worked. Being the
> author of such code meant that it wasn't very intuitive. Namely, the
> function names were not descriptive enough, or at least, they needed
> comments.
> 
> This series moves to solve some of that via changing a couple function
> names and parameters and adding comments to many of them.
> 

This series looks good to me.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhira...@kernel.org>

for this series.

Thanks!

> There's more to do, but this at least moves it in the right direction.
> 
> Changes since v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240604212817.384103...@goodmis.org/
> 
> - While working on v1 and responding to a comment from Mark Rutland about
>   the usage of "ftrace_hash" in the __ftrace_hash_rec_update() code,
>   I realized that the function does pretty much the same thing if
>   it is set or not set (but slightly differently). It turns out that
>   it isn't needed and that parameter can be removed, making the code
>   simpler.
> 
> - Fixed some wording and typos suggested by Mark Rutland.
> 
> Steven Rostedt (Google) (5):
>       ftrace: Rename dup_hash() and comment it
>       ftrace: Remove "ftrace_hash" parameter from __ftrace_hash_rec_update()
>       ftrace: Add comments to ftrace_hash_rec_disable/enable()
>       ftrace: Convert "inc" parameter to bool in 
> ftrace_hash_rec_update_modify()
>       ftrace: Add comments to ftrace_hash_move() and friends
> 
> ----
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 161 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to