Greg,
Have you given Grant's suggestion any further consideration?
I'd like to know how the MMCONFIG issues discussed in this thread are going
to be handled upstream. I have a patch implemented in RHEL 5.2, but I would
rather have the upstream patch implemented, whatever it is.
Grant Grundler wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:56:41AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:46:43AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
But so far, we have a zillion patches floating around, claiming
different things, some with signed-off-bys and others without, so for
now, I'll just stick with Arjan's patch in -mm and see if anyone
complains about those releases...
I complain about Arjan's patch. For reasons which have been adequately
gone into already in this thread.
Agreed.
Greg, I think at least two better alternatives were proposed already.
Please review the thread again.
grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
