On Thu, 23 May 2024 14:11:48 +0200
Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> wrote:

> Adding uretprobe shadow stack test that runs all existing
> uretprobe tests with shadow stack enabled if it's available.
> 

According to the document and sample code, this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhira...@kernel.org>

Thanks,

> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> index 3ef324c2db50..fda456401284 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
>  #include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <linux/stringify.h>
>  #include <sys/wait.h>
> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
> +#include <asm/prctl.h>
>  #include "uprobe_syscall.skel.h"
>  #include "uprobe_syscall_executed.skel.h"
>  
> @@ -297,6 +300,56 @@ static void test_uretprobe_syscall_call(void)
>       close(go[1]);
>       close(go[0]);
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Borrowed from tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_shadow_stack.c.
> + *
> + * For use in inline enablement of shadow stack.
> + *
> + * The program can't return from the point where shadow stack gets enabled
> + * because there will be no address on the shadow stack. So it can't use
> + * syscall() for enablement, since it is a function.
> + *
> + * Based on code from nolibc.h. Keep a copy here because this can't pull
> + * in all of nolibc.h.
> + */
> +#define ARCH_PRCTL(arg1, arg2)                                       \
> +({                                                           \
> +     long _ret;                                              \
> +     register long _num  asm("eax") = __NR_arch_prctl;       \
> +     register long _arg1 asm("rdi") = (long)(arg1);          \
> +     register long _arg2 asm("rsi") = (long)(arg2);          \
> +                                                             \
> +     asm volatile (                                          \
> +             "syscall\n"                                     \
> +             : "=a"(_ret)                                    \
> +             : "r"(_arg1), "r"(_arg2),                       \
> +               "0"(_num)                                     \
> +             : "rcx", "r11", "memory", "cc"                  \
> +     );                                                      \
> +     _ret;                                                   \
> +})
> +
> +#ifndef ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE
> +#define ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE    0x5001
> +#define ARCH_SHSTK_DISABLE   0x5002
> +#define ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK     (1ULL <<  0)
> +#endif
> +
> +static void test_uretprobe_shadow_stack(void)
> +{
> +     if (ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK)) {
> +             test__skip();
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* Run all of the uretprobe tests. */
> +     test_uretprobe_regs_equal();
> +     test_uretprobe_regs_change();
> +     test_uretprobe_syscall_call();
> +
> +     ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_DISABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK);
> +}
>  #else
>  static void test_uretprobe_regs_equal(void)
>  {
> @@ -312,6 +365,11 @@ static void test_uretprobe_syscall_call(void)
>  {
>       test__skip();
>  }
> +
> +static void test_uretprobe_shadow_stack(void)
> +{
> +     test__skip();
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  void test_uprobe_syscall(void)
> @@ -322,4 +380,6 @@ void test_uprobe_syscall(void)
>               test_uretprobe_regs_change();
>       if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_syscall_call"))
>               test_uretprobe_syscall_call();
> +     if (test__start_subtest("uretprobe_shadow_stack"))
> +             test_uretprobe_shadow_stack();
>  }
> -- 
> 2.45.1
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to