On 11/06/2024 22.11, Yan Zhai wrote:
skb does not include enough information to find out receiving
sockets/services and netns/containers on packet drops. In theory
skb->dev tells about netns, but it can get cleared/reused, e.g. by TCP
stack for OOO packet lookup. Similarly, skb->sk often identifies a local
sender, and tells nothing about a receiver.

Allow passing an extra receiving socket to the tracepoint to improve
the visibility on receiving drops.

Signed-off-by: Yan Zhai<[email protected]>
---
v3->v4: adjusted the TP_STRUCT field order to be consistent
v2->v3: fixed drop_monitor function prototype
---
  include/trace/events/skb.h | 11 +++++++----
  net/core/dev.c             |  2 +-
  net/core/drop_monitor.c    |  9 ++++++---
  net/core/skbuff.c          |  2 +-
  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h
index 07e0715628ec..3e9ea1cca6f2 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/skb.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h
@@ -24,13 +24,14 @@ DEFINE_DROP_REASON(FN, FN)
  TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb, void *location,
-                enum skb_drop_reason reason),
+                enum skb_drop_reason reason, struct sock *rx_sk),
- TP_ARGS(skb, location, reason),
+       TP_ARGS(skb, location, reason, rx_sk),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
                __field(void *,         skbaddr)
                __field(void *,         location)
+               __field(void *,         rx_skaddr)

Is there any reason for appending the "addr" part to "rx_sk" ?
It makes it harder to read this is the sk (socket).

AFAICR the skbaddr naming is a legacy thing.

                __field(unsigned short, protocol)
                __field(enum skb_drop_reason,   reason)
        ),
@@ -38,12 +39,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb,
        TP_fast_assign(
                __entry->skbaddr = skb;
                __entry->location = location;
+               __entry->rx_skaddr = rx_sk;
                __entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol);
                __entry->reason = reason;
        ),
- TP_printk("skbaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%pS reason: %s",
-                 __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location,
+       TP_printk("skbaddr=%p rx_skaddr=%p protocol=%u location=%pS reason: %s",
                              ^^^^^^^^^
I find it hard to visually tell skbaddr and rx_skaddr apart.
And especially noticing the "skb" vs "sk" part of the string.


+                 __entry->skbaddr, __entry->rx_skaddr, __entry->protocol,
+                 __entry->location,
                  __print_symbolic(__entry->reason,
                                   DEFINE_DROP_REASON(FN, FNe)))
  );


--Jesper

Reply via email to