Hello Andrew,
On 10.04.2024 15:59, Andrew Davis wrote:
Changes for v2:
- Use threaded irq as suggested by Hari and to
fix possible "scheduling while atomic" issue
sorry for beeing late, I noticed this already got merged.
I was wondering what the reason was for ending up with the
threaded irq.
In your v1 thread your final conclusion appeared to be
So for now I just kept this using the regular IRQ context as before.
We looked into this some time ago, and noticed that the IRQ approach
caused problems in the virtio/rpmsg code. I'd like to understand if your
change was for the same reason, or something else we missed before.
Regards,
Dominic
