No need to iterate over max number of VQs.

Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cra...@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Eugenio PĂ©rez <epere...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatu...@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c 
b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
index 96782b34e2b2..51630b1935f4 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
@@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static void suspend_vqs(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
 {
        int i;
 
-       for (i = 0; i < ndev->mvdev.max_vqs; i++)
+       for (i = 0; i < ndev->cur_num_vqs; i++)
                suspend_vq(ndev, &ndev->vqs[i]);
 }
 
@@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ static void resume_vq(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev, struct 
mlx5_vdpa_virtqueue *mv
 
 static void resume_vqs(struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
 {
-       for (int i = 0; i < ndev->mvdev.max_vqs; i++)
+       for (int i = 0; i < ndev->cur_num_vqs; i++)
                resume_vq(ndev, &ndev->vqs[i]);
 }
 

-- 
2.45.1


Reply via email to