nit: in theory in this patch we don't support it for any of the
transports, so I wouldn't confuse and take that part out of the title.
WDYT with someting like:
vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 02:08:35PM GMT, Luigi Leonardi via B4 Relay
wrote:
From: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leona...@outlook.com>
Add support for ioctl(s) for SOCK_STREAM SOCK_SEQPACKET and SOCK_DGRAM
in AF_VSOCK.
The only ioctl available is SIOCOUTQ/TIOCOUTQ, which returns the number
of unsent bytes in the socket. This information is transport-specific
and is delegated to them using a callback.
Suggested-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.deme...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leona...@outlook.com>
---
include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +++
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
index 535701efc1e5..7b5375ae7827 100644
--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
@@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ struct vsock_transport {
void (*notify_buffer_size)(struct vsock_sock *, u64 *);
int (*notify_set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
+ /* SIOCOUTQ ioctl */
+ size_t (*unsent_bytes)(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
If you want to return also errors, maybe better returning ssize_t.
This should fix one of the error reported by kernel bots.
+
/* Shutdown. */
int (*shutdown)(struct vsock_sock *, int);
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 4b040285aa78..d6140d73d122 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <net/af_vsock.h>
#include <uapi/linux/vm_sockets.h>
+#include <uapi/asm-generic/ioctls.h>
static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr);
static void vsock_sk_destruct(struct sock *sk);
@@ -1292,6 +1293,59 @@ int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct
msghdr *msg,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_dgram_recvmsg);
+static int vsock_do_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
+ int __user *arg)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
+ struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+ int retval;
+
+ vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case SIOCOUTQ: {
+ size_t n_bytes;
+
+ if (!vsk->transport || !vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
+ retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
This if is not necessary after the check we did earlier, right?
Removing it should fix the other issue reported by the bot.
+ if (sock_type_connectible(sk->sk_type) && sk->sk_state
== TCP_LISTEN) {
+ retval = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ n_bytes = vsk->transport->unsent_bytes(vsk);
+ if (n_bytes < 0) {
+ retval = n_bytes;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ retval = put_user(n_bytes, arg);
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
+ retval = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
+ }
+
+ return retval;
+}
+
+static int vsock_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
+ unsigned long arg)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ lock_sock(sock->sk);
+ ret = vsock_do_ioctl(sock, cmd, (int __user *)arg);
+ release_sock(sock->sk);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = {
.family = PF_VSOCK,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -1302,7 +1356,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_dgram_ops = {
.accept = sock_no_accept,
.getname = vsock_getname,
.poll = vsock_poll,
- .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+ .ioctl = vsock_ioctl,
.listen = sock_no_listen,
.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
.sendmsg = vsock_dgram_sendmsg,
@@ -2286,7 +2340,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
.accept = vsock_accept,
.getname = vsock_getname,
.poll = vsock_poll,
- .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+ .ioctl = vsock_ioctl,
.listen = vsock_listen,
.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
.setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt,
@@ -2308,7 +2362,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_seqpacket_ops = {
.accept = vsock_accept,
.getname = vsock_getname,
.poll = vsock_poll,
- .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+ .ioctl = vsock_ioctl,
.listen = vsock_listen,
.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
.setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt,
--
2.45.2
