On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 05:00:56PM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
> This patch adds the support for system suspend/resume to the ti_k3_R5
> remoteproc driver.
> 
> In order to save maximum power, the approach here is to shutdown
> completely the cores that were started by the kernel (i.e. those in
> RUNNING state).
> Those which were started before the kernel (in attached mode) will be
> detached.
> 
> The pm_notifier mechanism is used here because the remote procs firmwares
> have to be reloaded at resume, and thus the driver must have access to
> the file system were the firmware is stored.
> 
> On suspend, the running remote procs are stopped, the attached remote
> procs are detached and processor control released.
> 
> On resume, the reverse operation is done.
> 
> Based on work from: Hari Nagalla <hnaga...@ti.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.gen...@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c 
> b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> index 39a47540c590..1f18b08618c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
>  #include <linux/reset.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  
> @@ -112,6 +113,7 @@ struct k3_r5_cluster {
>       struct list_head cores;
>       wait_queue_head_t core_transition;
>       const struct k3_r5_soc_data *soc_data;
> +     struct notifier_block pm_notifier;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> @@ -577,7 +579,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>               /* do not allow core 1 to start before core 0 */
>               core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core,
>                                        elem);
> -             if (core != core0 && core0->rproc->state == RPROC_OFFLINE) {
> +             if (core != core0 && (core0->rproc->state == RPROC_OFFLINE ||
> +                                   core0->rproc->state == RPROC_SUSPENDED)) {

If I understand correctly, this is to address a possible race condition between
user space wanting to start core1 via sysfs while the system is being suspended.
Is this correct?  If so, please add a comment to explain what is going on.
Otherwise a comment is obviously needed.

>                       dev_err(dev, "%s: can not start core 1 before core 0\n",
>                               __func__);
>                       ret = -EPERM;
> @@ -646,7 +649,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>               /* do not allow core 0 to stop before core 1 */
>               core1 = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core,
>                                       elem);
> -             if (core != core1 && core1->rproc->state != RPROC_OFFLINE) {
> +             if (core != core1 && core1->rproc->state != RPROC_OFFLINE &&
> +                 core1->rproc->state != RPROC_SUSPENDED) {
>                       dev_err(dev, "%s: can not stop core 0 before core 1\n",
>                               __func__);
>                       ret = -EPERM;
> @@ -1238,6 +1242,117 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct 
> k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int k3_r5_rproc_suspend(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +     unsigned int rproc_state = kproc->rproc->state;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     if (rproc_state != RPROC_RUNNING && rproc_state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     if (rproc_state == RPROC_RUNNING)
> +             ret = rproc_shutdown(kproc->rproc);
> +     else
> +             ret = rproc_detach(kproc->rproc);
> +
> +     if (ret) {
> +             dev_err(kproc->dev, "Failed to %s rproc (%d)\n",
> +                     (rproc_state == RPROC_RUNNING) ? "shutdown" : "detach",
> +                     ret);
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +
> +     kproc->rproc->state = RPROC_SUSPENDED;
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int k3_r5_rproc_resume(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     if (kproc->rproc->state != RPROC_SUSPENDED)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     ret = k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(kproc);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             return -EBUSY;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * ret > 0 for IPC-only mode
> +      * ret == 0 for remote proc mode
> +      */
> +     if (ret == 0) {
> +             /*
> +              * remote proc looses its configuration when powered off.
> +              * So, we have to configure it again on resume.
> +              */
> +             ret = k3_r5_rproc_configure(kproc);
> +             if (ret < 0) {
> +                     dev_err(kproc->dev, "k3_r5_rproc_configure failed 
> (%d)\n", ret);
> +                     return -EBUSY;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     return rproc_boot(kproc->rproc);
> +}
> +
> +static int k3_r5_cluster_pm_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *bl,
> +                                       unsigned long state, void *unused)
> +{
> +     struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = container_of(bl, struct k3_r5_cluster,
> +                                                  pm_notifier);
> +     struct k3_r5_core *core;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     switch (state) {
> +     case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
> +     case PM_RESTORE_PREPARE:
> +     case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
> +             /* core1 should be suspended before core0 */
> +             list_for_each_entry_reverse(core, &cluster->cores, elem) {
> +                     /*
> +                      * In LOCKSTEP mode, rproc is allocated only for
> +                      * core0
> +                      */
> +                     if (core->rproc) {
> +                             ret = k3_r5_rproc_suspend(core->rproc->priv);
> +                             if (ret)
> +                                     dev_warn(core->dev,
> +                                              "k3_r5_rproc_suspend failed 
> (%d)\n", ret);
> +                     }
> +
> +                     ret = ti_sci_proc_release(core->tsp);
> +                     if (ret)
> +                             dev_warn(core->dev, "ti_sci_proc_release failed 
> (%d)\n", ret);
> +             }
> +             break;
> +     case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
> +     case PM_POST_RESTORE:
> +     case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
> +             /* core0 should be started before core1 */
> +             list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) {
> +                     ret = ti_sci_proc_request(core->tsp);
> +                     if (ret)
> +                             dev_warn(core->dev, "ti_sci_proc_request failed 
> (%d)\n", ret);
> +
> +                     /*
> +                      * In LOCKSTEP mode, rproc is allocated only for
> +                      * core0
> +                      */
> +                     if (core->rproc) {
> +                             ret = k3_r5_rproc_resume(core->rproc->priv);
> +                             if (ret)
> +                                     dev_warn(core->dev,
> +                                              "k3_r5_rproc_resume failed 
> (%d)\n", ret);
> +                     }
> +             }
> +             break;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>       struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> @@ -1336,6 +1451,9 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     cluster->pm_notifier.notifier_call = k3_r5_cluster_pm_notifier_call;
> +     register_pm_notifier(&cluster->pm_notifier);
> +
>       return 0;
>  
>  err_split:
> @@ -1402,6 +1520,7 @@ static void k3_r5_cluster_rproc_exit(void *data)
>               rproc_free(rproc);
>               core->rproc = NULL;
>       }
> +     unregister_pm_notifier(&cluster->pm_notifier);
>  }
>  
>  static int k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,

Reply via email to