Hi Jiri, On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 18:41:07 +0200 Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> wrote:
> Adding support for uprobe consumer to be defined as session and have > new behaviour for consumer's 'handler' and 'ret_handler' callbacks. > > The session means that 'handler' and 'ret_handler' callbacks are > connected in a way that allows to: > > - control execution of 'ret_handler' from 'handler' callback > - share data between 'handler' and 'ret_handler' callbacks > > The session is enabled by setting new 'session' bool field to true > in uprobe_consumer object. > > We keep count of session consumers for uprobe and allocate session_consumer > object for each in return_instance object. This allows us to store > return values of 'handler' callbacks and data pointers of shared > data between both handlers. > > The session concept fits to our common use case where we do filtering > on entry uprobe and based on the result we decide to run the return > uprobe (or not). > > It's also convenient to share the data between session callbacks. > > The control of 'ret_handler' callback execution is done via return > value of the 'handler' callback. If it's 0 we install and execute > return uprobe, if it's 1 we do not. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> > --- > include/linux/uprobes.h | 16 ++++- > kernel/events/uprobes.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 6 +- > kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 12 ++-- > 4 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h > index f46e0ca0169c..903a860a8d01 100644 > --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h > +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h > @@ -34,15 +34,18 @@ enum uprobe_filter_ctx { > }; > > struct uprobe_consumer { > - int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs); > + int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs, > __u64 *data); > int (*ret_handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, > unsigned long func, > - struct pt_regs *regs); > + struct pt_regs *regs, __u64 *data); > bool (*filter)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, > enum uprobe_filter_ctx ctx, > struct mm_struct *mm); > > struct uprobe_consumer *next; > + > + bool session; /* marks uprobe session > consumer */ > + unsigned int session_id; /* set when uprobe_consumer is > registered */ Hmm, why this has both session and session_id? I also think we can use the address of uprobe_consumer itself as a unique id. Also, if we can set session enabled by default, and skip ret_handler by handler's return value, it is more simpler. (If handler returns a specific value, skip ret_handler) > }; > > #ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES > @@ -80,6 +83,12 @@ struct uprobe_task { > unsigned int depth; > }; > > +struct session_consumer { > + __u64 cookie; And this cookie looks not scalable. If we can pass a data to handler, I would like to reuse it to pass the target function parameters to ret_handler as kretprobe/fprobe does. int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs, void *data); uprobes can collect its uc's required sizes and allocate the memory (shadow stack frame) at handler_chain(). > + unsigned int id; > + int rc; > +}; > + > struct return_instance { > struct uprobe *uprobe; > unsigned long func; > @@ -88,6 +97,9 @@ struct return_instance { > bool chained; /* true, if instance is nested > */ > > struct return_instance *next; /* keep as stack */ > + > + int sessions_cnt; > + struct session_consumer sessions[]; In that case, we don't have this array, but char data[]; And decode data array, which is a slice of variable length structure; struct session_consumer { struct uprobe_consumer *uc; char data[]; }; The size of session_consumer is uc->session_data_size + sizeof(uc). What would you think? Thank you, > }; > > enum rp_check { > diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c > index 2c83ba776fc7..4da410460f2a 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c > +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c > @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct uprobe { > loff_t ref_ctr_offset; > unsigned long flags; > > + unsigned int sessions_cnt; > + > /* > * The generic code assumes that it has two members of unknown type > * owned by the arch-specific code: > @@ -750,11 +752,30 @@ static struct uprobe *alloc_uprobe(struct inode *inode, > loff_t offset, > return uprobe; > } > > +static void > +uprobe_consumer_account(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc) > +{ > + static unsigned int session_id; > + > + if (uc->session) { > + uprobe->sessions_cnt++; > + uc->session_id = ++session_id ?: ++session_id; > + } > +} > + > +static void > +uprobe_consumer_unaccount(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc) > +{ > + if (uc->session) > + uprobe->sessions_cnt--; > +} > + > static void consumer_add(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc) > { > down_write(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem); > uc->next = uprobe->consumers; > uprobe->consumers = uc; > + uprobe_consumer_account(uprobe, uc); > up_write(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem); > } > > @@ -773,6 +794,7 @@ static bool consumer_del(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct > uprobe_consumer *uc) > if (*con == uc) { > *con = uc->next; > ret = true; > + uprobe_consumer_unaccount(uprobe, uc); > break; > } > } > @@ -1744,6 +1766,23 @@ static struct uprobe_task *get_utask(void) > return current->utask; > } > > +static size_t ri_size(int sessions_cnt) > +{ > + struct return_instance *ri __maybe_unused; > + > + return sizeof(*ri) + sessions_cnt * sizeof(ri->sessions[0]); > +} > + > +static struct return_instance *alloc_return_instance(int sessions_cnt) > +{ > + struct return_instance *ri; > + > + ri = kzalloc(ri_size(sessions_cnt), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (ri) > + ri->sessions_cnt = sessions_cnt; > + return ri; > +} > + > static int dup_utask(struct task_struct *t, struct uprobe_task *o_utask) > { > struct uprobe_task *n_utask; > @@ -1756,11 +1795,11 @@ static int dup_utask(struct task_struct *t, struct > uprobe_task *o_utask) > > p = &n_utask->return_instances; > for (o = o_utask->return_instances; o; o = o->next) { > - n = kmalloc(sizeof(struct return_instance), GFP_KERNEL); > + n = alloc_return_instance(o->sessions_cnt); > if (!n) > return -ENOMEM; > > - *n = *o; > + memcpy(n, o, ri_size(o->sessions_cnt)); > get_uprobe(n->uprobe); > n->next = NULL; > > @@ -1853,9 +1892,9 @@ static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task > *utask, bool chained, > utask->return_instances = ri; > } > > -static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) > +static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, > + struct return_instance *ri) > { > - struct return_instance *ri; > struct uprobe_task *utask; > unsigned long orig_ret_vaddr, trampoline_vaddr; > bool chained; > @@ -1874,9 +1913,11 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, > struct pt_regs *regs) > return; > } > > - ri = kmalloc(sizeof(struct return_instance), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!ri) > - return; > + if (!ri) { > + ri = alloc_return_instance(0); > + if (!ri) > + return; > + } > > trampoline_vaddr = get_trampoline_vaddr(); > orig_ret_vaddr = arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(trampoline_vaddr, > regs); > @@ -2065,35 +2106,85 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe(unsigned > long bp_vaddr, int *is_swbp) > return uprobe; > } > > +static struct session_consumer * > +session_consumer_next(struct return_instance *ri, struct session_consumer > *sc, > + int session_id) > +{ > + struct session_consumer *next; > + > + next = sc ? sc + 1 : &ri->sessions[0]; > + next->id = session_id; > + return next; > +} > + > +static struct session_consumer * > +session_consumer_find(struct return_instance *ri, int *iter, int session_id) > +{ > + struct session_consumer *sc; > + int idx = *iter; > + > + for (sc = &ri->sessions[idx]; idx < ri->sessions_cnt; idx++, sc++) { > + if (sc->id == session_id) { > + *iter = idx + 1; > + return sc; > + } > + } > + return NULL; > +} > + > static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) > { > struct uprobe_consumer *uc; > int remove = UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE; > + struct session_consumer *sc = NULL; > + struct return_instance *ri = NULL; > bool need_prep = false; /* prepare return uprobe, when needed */ > > down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem); > + if (uprobe->sessions_cnt) { > + ri = alloc_return_instance(uprobe->sessions_cnt); > + if (!ri) > + goto out; > + } > + > for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) { > + __u64 *cookie = NULL; > int rc = 0; > > + if (uc->session) { > + sc = session_consumer_next(ri, sc, uc->session_id); > + cookie = &sc->cookie; > + } > + > if (uc->handler) { > - rc = uc->handler(uc, regs); > + rc = uc->handler(uc, regs, cookie); > WARN(rc & ~UPROBE_HANDLER_MASK, > "bad rc=0x%x from %ps()\n", rc, uc->handler); > } > > - if (uc->ret_handler) > + if (uc->session) { > + sc->rc = rc; > + need_prep |= !rc; > + } else if (uc->ret_handler) { > need_prep = true; > + } > > remove &= rc; > } > > + /* no removal if there's at least one session consumer */ > + remove &= !uprobe->sessions_cnt; > + > if (need_prep && !remove) > - prepare_uretprobe(uprobe, regs); /* put bp at return */ > + prepare_uretprobe(uprobe, regs, ri); /* put bp at return */ > + else > + kfree(ri); > > if (remove && uprobe->consumers) { > WARN_ON(!uprobe_is_active(uprobe)); > unapply_uprobe(uprobe, current->mm); > } > + out: > up_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem); > } > > @@ -2101,12 +2192,28 @@ static void > handle_uretprobe_chain(struct return_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs) > { > struct uprobe *uprobe = ri->uprobe; > + struct session_consumer *sc; > struct uprobe_consumer *uc; > + int session_iter = 0; > > down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem); > for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) { > + __u64 *cookie = NULL; > + > + if (uc->session) { > + /* > + * Consumers could be added and removed, but they will > not > + * change position, so we can iterate sessions just once > + * and keep the last found session as base for next > search. > + */ > + sc = session_consumer_find(ri, &session_iter, > uc->session_id); > + if (!sc || sc->rc) > + continue; > + cookie = &sc->cookie; > + } > + > if (uc->ret_handler) > - uc->ret_handler(uc, ri->func, regs); > + uc->ret_handler(uc, ri->func, regs, cookie); > } > up_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem); > } > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > index cd098846e251..02d052639dfe 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > @@ -3332,7 +3332,8 @@ uprobe_multi_link_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *con, > enum uprobe_filter_ctx ctx > } > > static int > -uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs) > +uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs, > + __u64 *data) > { > struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe; > > @@ -3341,7 +3342,8 @@ uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, > struct pt_regs *regs) > } > > static int > -uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, unsigned long > func, struct pt_regs *regs) > +uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, unsigned long > func, struct pt_regs *regs, > + __u64 *data) > { > struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe; > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c > index c98e3b3386ba..7068c279a244 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c > @@ -88,9 +88,11 @@ static struct trace_uprobe *to_trace_uprobe(struct > dyn_event *ev) > static int register_uprobe_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu); > static int unregister_uprobe_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu); > > -static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs > *regs); > +static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs > *regs, > + __u64 *data); > static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, > - unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs); > + unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs, > + __u64 *data); > > #ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP > static unsigned long adjust_stack_addr(unsigned long addr, unsigned int n) > @@ -1504,7 +1506,8 @@ trace_uprobe_register(struct trace_event_call *event, > enum trace_reg type, > } > } > > -static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs > *regs) > +static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs > *regs, > + __u64 *data) > { > struct trace_uprobe *tu; > struct uprobe_dispatch_data udd; > @@ -1534,7 +1537,8 @@ static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer > *con, struct pt_regs *regs) > } > > static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, > - unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs) > + unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs, > + __u64 *data) > { > struct trace_uprobe *tu; > struct uprobe_dispatch_data udd; > -- > 2.45.2 > -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhira...@kernel.org>