On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:55:42PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:00:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Let me ponder that a little, I *can* make it work, but all 'solutions'
> > I've come up with so far are really rather vile.
> 
> This is the least horrible solution I could come up with...
> 
> ---
> --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ struct uprobe_task {
>  
>       struct timer_list               ri_timer;
>       struct callback_head            ri_task_work;
> +     bool                            ri_work_pending;
>       struct task_struct              *task;
>  };
>  
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -1797,9 +1797,8 @@ void uprobe_free_utask(struct task_struc
>       t->utask = NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static void return_instance_task_work(struct callback_head *head)
> +static void __return_instance_put(struct uprobe_task *utask)
>  {
> -     struct uprobe_task *utask = container_of(head, struct uprobe_task, 
> ri_task_work);
>       struct return_instance *ri;
>  
>       for (ri = utask->return_instances; ri; ri = ri->next) {
> @@ -1815,9 +1814,43 @@ static void return_instance_task_work(st
>       }
>  }
>  
> +static void return_instance_task_work(struct callback_head *head)
> +{
> +     struct uprobe_task *utask = container_of(head, struct uprobe_task, 
> ri_task_work);
> +     utask->ri_work_pending = false;
> +     __return_instance_put(utask);
> +}
> +
> +static int return_instance_blocked(struct task_struct *p, void *arg)
> +{
> +     unsigned int state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
> +
> +     if (state == TASK_RUNNING || state == TASK_WAKING)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     smp_rmb();
> +     if (p->on_rq)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Per __task_needs_rq_locked() we now have: !p->on_cpu and only hold
> +      * p->pi_lock, and can consiter the task fully blocked.
> +      */
> +
> +     __return_instance_put(p->utask);

PREEMPT_RT might not like this though, doing the full RI iteration under
a raw_spinlock_t...

I just can't think of anything saner just now. Oh well, let me go make
dinner, perhaps something will come to me.

Reply via email to