在 2024/7/12 下午7:53, Breno Leitao 写道:
After the commit bdacf3e34945 ("net: Use nested-BH locking for
napi_alloc_cache.") was merged, the following warning began to appear:

         WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1 at net/core/skbuff.c:1451 
napi_skb_cache_put+0x82/0x4b0

          __warn+0x12f/0x340
          napi_skb_cache_put+0x82/0x4b0
          napi_skb_cache_put+0x82/0x4b0
          report_bug+0x165/0x370
          handle_bug+0x3d/0x80
          exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x50
          asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
          __free_old_xmit+0x1c8/0x510
          napi_skb_cache_put+0x82/0x4b0
          __free_old_xmit+0x1c8/0x510
          __free_old_xmit+0x1c8/0x510
          __pfx___free_old_xmit+0x10/0x10

The issue arises because virtio is assuming it's running in NAPI context
even when it's not, such as in the netpoll case.

To resolve this, modify virtnet_poll_tx() to only set NAPI when budget
is available. Same for virtnet_poll_cleantx(), which always assumed that
it was in a NAPI context.

Fixes: df133f3f9625 ("virtio_net: bulk free tx skbs")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <lei...@debian.org>
---
  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 8 ++++----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Heng Qi <hen...@linux.alibaba.com>


diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 0b4747e81464..fb1331827308 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -2341,7 +2341,7 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int 
budget,
        return packets;
  }
-static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq)
+static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
  {
        struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
        unsigned int index = vq2rxq(rq->vq);
@@ -2359,7 +2359,7 @@ static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq)
do {
                        virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
-                       free_old_xmit(sq, txq, true);
+                       free_old_xmit(sq, txq, !!budget);
                } while (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(sq->vq)));
if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
@@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int 
budget)
        unsigned int xdp_xmit = 0;
        bool napi_complete;
- virtnet_poll_cleantx(rq);
+       virtnet_poll_cleantx(rq, budget);
received = virtnet_receive(rq, budget, &xdp_xmit);
        rq->packets_in_napi += received;
@@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int 
budget)
        txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, index);
        __netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
        virtqueue_disable_cb(sq->vq);
-       free_old_xmit(sq, txq, true);
+       free_old_xmit(sq, txq, !!budget);
if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
                if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq)) {

Reply via email to