On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:35:27 +0100
Gary Guo <g...@garyguo.net> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Declare an exported function that Rust code can call to trigger this
> > + * tracepoint. This function does not include the static branch; that is
> > done
> > + * in Rust to avoid a function call when the tracepoint is disabled.
> > + */
> > +#define DEFINE_RUST_DO_TRACE(name, proto, args)
> > +#define DEFINE_RUST_DO_TRACE_REAL(name, proto, args)
> > \
> > + notrace void rust_do_trace_##name(proto) \
> > + { \
> > + __DO_TRACE(name, \
> > + TP_ARGS(args), \
> > + cpu_online(raw_smp_processor_id()), 0); \
>
> I guess this doesn't support conditions. Currently the conditions are
> specified during declaration and not during definition.
>
> Would it make sense to have
>
> static inline void do_trace_##name(proto)
> {
> __DO_TRACE(name, TP_ARGS(args), TP_CONDITION(cond), 0);
But where is the "cond" passed in from?
I guess in the future if you want to add conditions, you would then just
add:
#define DEFINE_RUST_DO_TRACE_REAL_CONDITION(name, proto, args, cond)
\
notrace void rust_do_trace_##name(proto) \
{ \
__DO_TRACE(name, \
TP_ARGS(args), \
cpu_online(raw_smp_processor_id()) && \
TP_CONDITION(cond), 0); \
-- Steve
> }
>
> in `__DECLARE_TRACE` and then simply call it in `rust_do_trace_##name`?
>
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
