On 8/26/24 11:22 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> First and foremost the overall structure of your code has improved immensely
> and
> I commend you for that.
>
Thanks! I hope to get better.
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 10:09:38AM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> AMD-Xilinx zynqmp platform contains on-chip sram memory (OCM).
>> R5 cores can access OCM and access is faster than DDR memory but slower
>> than TCM memories available. Sram region can have optional multiple
>> power-domains. Platform management firmware is responsible
>> to operate these power-domains.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.s...@amd.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Free previously allocalted genpool if adding carveouts fail for any
>> sram.
>> - add comment about sram size used in creating carveouts.
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - make @sram an array rather than an array of pointers
>> - fix of_node_put usage to maintain proper refcount of node
>> - s/proprty/property
>> - Use gen pool framework for mapping sram address space.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Expand commit message with power-domains related information.
>>
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 165 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> index 2cea97c746fd..6d2ac7b85c8a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>> #include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
>> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> #include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
>> +#include <linux/genalloc.h>
>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> #include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
>> #include <linux/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-message.h>
>> @@ -56,6 +57,21 @@ struct mem_bank_data {
>> char *bank_name;
>> };
>>
>> +/**
>> + * struct zynqmp_sram_bank - sram bank description
>> + *
>> + * @sram_pool: gen pool for his sram
>> + * @sram_res: sram address region information
>> + * @va: virtual address of allocated genpool
>> + * @da: device address of sram
>> + */
>> +struct zynqmp_sram_bank {
>> + struct gen_pool *sram_pool;
>> + struct resource sram_res;
>> + void __iomem *va;
>> + u32 da;
>> +};
>> +
>> /**
>> * struct mbox_info
>> *
>> @@ -120,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct mem_bank_data
>> zynqmp_tcm_banks_lockstep[] = {
>> * struct zynqmp_r5_core
>> *
>> * @rsc_tbl_va: resource table virtual address
>> + * @sram: Array of sram memories assigned to this core
>> + * @num_sram: number of sram for this core
>> * @dev: device of RPU instance
>> * @np: device node of RPU instance
>> * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU
>> @@ -131,6 +149,8 @@ static const struct mem_bank_data
>> zynqmp_tcm_banks_lockstep[] = {
>> */
>> struct zynqmp_r5_core {
>> void __iomem *rsc_tbl_va;
>> + struct zynqmp_sram_bank *sram;
>> + int num_sram;
>> struct device *dev;
>> struct device_node *np;
>> int tcm_bank_count;
>> @@ -494,6 +514,56 @@ static int add_mem_regions_carveout(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int add_sram_carveouts(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *rproc_mem;
>> + struct zynqmp_sram_bank *sram;
>> + size_t len, pool_size;
>> + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>> + int da, i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->num_sram; i++) {
>> + sram = &r5_core->sram[i];
>> +
>> + dma_addr = (dma_addr_t)sram->sram_res.start;
>> +
>> + /* Use actual resource size, as genpool size can be rounded up
>> */
>> + len = resource_size(&sram->sram_res);
>> + da = sram->da;
>> +
>> + pool_size = gen_pool_size(sram[i].sram_pool);
>> + sram->va = (void __iomem *)gen_pool_alloc(sram->sram_pool,
>> pool_size);
>
> The genpool subsystem API is used to allocate the genpool but other than
> being free'd int zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare(), nothing is done with the
> genpool.
API gen_pool_alloc gives virtual address, and that is used to read/write sram
memory.
I think that is genpool framework's expected usage.
I am okay, to use ioremap APIs instead (like other drivers).
For now I don't see any problem with using ioremap_* APIs.
In future if any conflict happens with sram driver, I will refactor as needed.
I will refactor v5 accordingly.
Thanks.
> Do you have plans to change that in an upcoming patchset? If not please
> remove.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
>> + if (!sram->va) {
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to alloc sram idx %d
>> pool\n", i);
>> + goto fail_add_sram_carveouts;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rproc_mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, sram->va,
>> + (dma_addr_t)dma_addr,
>> + len, da,
>> + NULL, NULL,
>> + sram->sram_res.name);
>> +
>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, rproc_mem);
>> + rproc_coredump_add_segment(rproc, da, len);
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "sram carveout %s addr=%llx, da=0x%x,
>> size=0x%lx",
>> + sram->sram_res.name, dma_addr, da, len);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +fail_add_sram_carveouts:
>> + while (--i > 0) {
>> + pool_size = gen_pool_size(sram[i].sram_pool);
>> + gen_pool_free(sram[i].sram_pool,
>> + (unsigned long)r5_core->sram[i].va, pool_size);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * tcm_mem_unmap()
>> * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> @@ -669,6 +739,12 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> + ret = add_sram_carveouts(rproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to get sram carveout %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -695,6 +771,12 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc
>> *rproc)
>> "can't turn off TCM bank 0x%x", pm_domain_id);
>> }
>>
>> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->num_sram; i++) {
>> + gen_pool_free(r5_core->sram[i].sram_pool,
>> + (unsigned long)r5_core->sram[i].va,
>> + gen_pool_size(r5_core->sram[i].sram_pool));
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -881,6 +963,85 @@ static struct zynqmp_r5_core
>> *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> }
>>
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_sram_banks(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np = r5_core->np;
>> + struct device *dev = r5_core->dev;
>> + struct zynqmp_sram_bank *sram;
>> + struct device_node *sram_np;
>> + int num_sram, i, ret;
>> + u64 abs_addr, size;
>> +
>> + /* "sram" is optional property. Do not fail, if unavailable. */
>> + if (!of_property_present(r5_core->np, "sram"))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + num_sram = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "sram", sizeof(phandle));
>> + if (num_sram <= 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid sram property, ret = %d\n",
>> + num_sram);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + sram = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_sram,
>> + sizeof(struct zynqmp_sram_bank), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!sram)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_sram; i++) {
>> + sram_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "sram", i);
>> + if (!sram_np) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get sram %d phandle\n", i);
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto fail_sram_get;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!of_device_is_available(sram_np)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "sram device not available\n");
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto fail_sram_get;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = of_address_to_resource(sram_np, 0, &sram[i].sram_res);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "addr to res failed\n");
>> + goto fail_sram_get;
>> + }
>> +
>> + sram[i].sram_pool = of_gen_pool_get(np, "sram", i);
>> + if (!sram[i].sram_pool) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get sram idx %d gen pool\n", i);
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto fail_sram_get;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Get SRAM device address */
>> + ret = of_property_read_reg(sram_np, i, &abs_addr, &size);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reg property\n");
>> + goto fail_sram_get;
>> + }
>> +
>> + sram[i].da = (u32)abs_addr;
>> +
>> + of_node_put(sram_np);
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "sram %d: name=%s, addr=0x%llx, da=0x%x,
>> size=0x%llx\n",
>> + i, sram[i].sram_res.name, sram[i].sram_res.start,
>> + sram[i].da, resource_size(&sram[i].sram_res));
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->sram = sram;
>> + r5_core->num_sram = num_sram;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +fail_sram_get:
>> + of_node_put(sram_np);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> {
>> int i, j, tcm_bank_count, ret, tcm_pd_idx, pd_count;
>> @@ -1095,6 +1256,10 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct
>> zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
>> return ret;
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_sram_banks(r5_core);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> base-commit: 1a491aaf1d1ce3a1cf5190394c36f21d805c7e96
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
