On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 12:04:22 +0200 Antonio Quartulli wrote: > > Or we could check if len(self.checks) <= 1 early and throw our hands up > > if there is more, for now? > > We already perform the same check in the 'else' branch below. > It'd be about moving it at the beginning of the function and bail out if > true, right? > > Should I modify this patch and move the check above?
I just sent the refactor patch, that seemed easier than explaining ;)
