On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 11:46 PM Zhu Jun <zhuj...@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
>
> The error check is no longer needed for this test case,
> simplifying the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhuj...@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/signal_pending.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>

please add b...@vger.kernel.org and resend. Also use [PATCH bpf-next]
prefix for email subject.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/signal_pending.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/signal_pending.c
> index 70b49da5ca0a..8920fadb3aa9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/signal_pending.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/signal_pending.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static void test_signal_pending_by_type(enum bpf_prog_type 
> prog_type)
>         err = setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &timeo, NULL);
>         ASSERT_OK(err, "test-run-signal-timer");
>
> -       err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
> +       bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
>         ASSERT_LE(topts.duration, 500000000 /* 500ms */,
>                   "test-run-signal-duration");
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
>

Reply via email to