On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 00:57 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:22:45PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > Hello! > > > > It have come to my attention that a patch has been committed to the > > kernel with the explicit purpose of tainting ndiswrapper - the kernel > > module allowing Windows NDIS drivers for Ethernet and Wireless cards to > > be used by the kernel. > >... > > Just to reiterate some points from the old discussion: > >... > > - no copyright violation is involved, as Windows drivers are not derived > > from Linux sources > >... > > It is interesting that someone posting with an @gnu.org address claims > that dynamic linking of not GPLv2 compatible code into GPLv2 code was > not a copyright violation.
No, I'm representing myself only. I don't think you represent all kernel developers when posting from the kernel.org address. I'm actually surprised that you are raising this issue. If the motivation to ban ndiswrapper is based on the copyright law, doesn't it meant that we have DRM in the kernel now? Is Linux going to enforce copyright laws across the world? > Is it an official statement of the FSF that such linking is considered > legal? Absolutely not. > (RMS added to Cc) I, for one, would welcome an informed position of the FSF. It may have interesting implications for Wine, ReactOS, mplayer, qemu, Java and many other programs loading non-free compiled code at the run time. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
