Hello,

On 11/8/24 5:51 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 10:31:58AM +0100, Dragos Tatulea wrote:
>>
>> On 07.11.24 22:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:11:14AM -0500, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
>>>> From: Carlos Bilbao <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Initialize the speed and duplex fields in virtio_net_config to UNKNOWN.
>>>> This is needed because mlx5_vdpa vDPA devices currently do not support the
>>>> VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX feature which reports speed and duplex.
>>> I see no logic here. Without this feature bit, guests will not read
>>> this field, why do we suddenly need to initialize it?
>>>
>> IIRC, Carlos was reading data via ioctl VHOST_VDPA_GET_CONFIG which calls
>> .get_config() directly, always exposing the speed and duplex config fields 
>> [0].
>> Carlos, was this the case?
>>
>> [0] 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dragos
> Basically, driver should ignore these if feature is not set.


There _is_ a chance the guest could read this field; As Dragos mentioned, I
was using the VHOST_VDPA_GET_CONFIG ioctl from userspace, and the incorrect
field initialization led me to believe I was in half-duplex mode --
something people told me they hadn't seen since the 80s. But as Andrew
(CCed) mentioned, "If the speed is 0, does duplex even matter?".

I also tried to remove the pointless ioctl call altogether to avoid further
confusion [0] but that wasn't viable due to spec compliance.

Initializing the fields seems the simple solution here (and, IMHO, more
generally, it's as a good programming practice)

Thanks for looking into this!

Best,
Carlos

[0] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CACGkMEvfdUYLjx-Z+oB11XW-54ErJsQMKcnu2p=dsj5n_bi...@mail.gmail.com/


>
>
>>>> Add
>>>> needed helper cpu_to_mlx5vdpa32() to convert endianness of speed.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <[email protected]>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c 
>>>> b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>>> index b56aae3f7be3..41ca268d43ff 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>>> @@ -173,6 +173,11 @@ static __virtio16 cpu_to_mlx5vdpa16(struct 
>>>> mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, u16 val)
>>>>    return __cpu_to_virtio16(mlx5_vdpa_is_little_endian(mvdev), val);
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> +static __virtio32 cpu_to_mlx5vdpa32(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, u32 val)
>>>> +{
>>>> +  return __cpu_to_virtio32(mlx5_vdpa_is_little_endian(mvdev), val);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  static u16 ctrl_vq_idx(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev)
>>>>  {
>>>>    if (!(mvdev->actual_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ)))
>>>> @@ -3433,6 +3438,13 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_dev_add(struct vdpa_mgmt_dev 
>>>> *v_mdev, const char *name,
>>>>    init_rwsem(&ndev->reslock);
>>>>    config = &ndev->config;
>>>>  
>>>> +  /*
>>>> +   * mlx5_vdpa vDPA devices currently don't support reporting or
>>>> +   * setting the speed or duplex.
>>>> +   */
>>>> +  config->speed  = cpu_to_mlx5vdpa32(mvdev, SPEED_UNKNOWN);
>>>> +  config->duplex = DUPLEX_UNKNOWN;
>>>> +
>>>>    if (add_config->mask & BIT_ULL(VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU)) {
>>>>            err = config_func_mtu(mdev, add_config->net.mtu);
>>>>            if (err)
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.34.1

Reply via email to