From: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 1a4607ffba35bf2a630aab299e34dd3f6e658d70 ]

Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate
packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call
invalidates packet pointers.

Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes
use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for
global sub-programs, such that the following program could be
rejected:

    int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
        bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0);
        return 0;
    }

    SEC("tc")
    int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
        int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data;
        ... make p valid ...
        tail_call(sk);
        *p = 42; /* this is unsafe */
        ...
    }

The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that
can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with
tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 net/core/filter.c                              | 2 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 33125317994e..bbd0c08072cb 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -7934,6 +7934,8 @@ bool bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
        case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_head:
        case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_meta:
        case BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_tail:
+       /* tail-called program could call any of the above */
+       case BPF_FUNC_tail_call:
                return true;
        default:
                return false;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
index 8a0632c37839..79f5087dade2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ int subprog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
        int ret = 1;
 
        __sink(ret);
+       /* let verifier know that 'subprog_tc' can change pointers to skb->data 
*/
+       bpf_skb_change_proto(skb, 0, 0);
        return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.39.5


Reply via email to