Hi!

> > And making the kernel preemptive might be the best way to do that
> > (and I'm saying "might"...).
> 
> Keep in mind that Ken Thompson & Dennis Ritchie did not decide on a 
> non-preemptive strategy for UNIX because they were unaware of such 
> methods or because they were stupid. And when Rob Pike redesigned a new
> "unix" Plan9  note there is no-preemptive kernel, and the core Linux
> designers have rejected preemptive kernels too. Now it is certainly possible
> that things have change and/or all these folks are just plain wrong. But
> I wouldn't bet too much on it.

Wrong. It was linus who suggested how to do preemptive kernel nicely. I
guess he counts as core Linux designer ;-).
                                                                Pavel
-- 
I'm [EMAIL PROTECTED] "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to