On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:42 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:13:37AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > The test already prints the same information on failure; remove
> > redundant pr_debug() logs.
>
> ...
>
> > #define _check_numbers_template(arg_fmt, expect, str, fmt, n_args, ap)
> > \
> > do {
> > \
> > - pr_debug("\"%s\", \"%s\" ->\n", str, fmt);
> > \
>
> What *if* the n_args == 0 here?
Then there's no assertion in this block, so the test cannot possibly fail here.
> > for (; n_args > 0; n_args--, expect++) {
> > \
> > typeof(*expect) got = *va_arg(ap, typeof(expect));
> > \
> > - pr_debug("\t" arg_fmt "\n", got);
> > \
> > if (got != *expect) {
> > \
> > pr_warn("vsscanf(\"%s\", \"%s\", ...) expected "
> > arg_fmt " got " arg_fmt "\n", \
> > str, fmt, *expect, got);
> > \
> > @@ -689,7 +687,6 @@ do {
> > \
> > total_tests++;
> > \
> > len = snprintf(test_buffer, BUF_SIZE, gen_fmt, expect);
> > \
> > got = (fn)(test_buffer, &endp, base);
> > \
> > - pr_debug(#fn "(\"%s\", %d) -> " gen_fmt "\n", test_buffer, base,
> > got); \
> > if (got != (expect)) {
> > \
> > fail = true;
> > \
> > pr_warn(#fn "(\"%s\", %d): got " gen_fmt " expected " gen_fmt
> > "\n", \
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
