On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 10:27 AM Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/7/25 08:03, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 16:39:03 +0700, Bui Quang Minh
> > <minhquangbu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> When pausing rx (e.g. set up xdp, xsk pool, rx resize), we call
> >> napi_disable() on the receive queue's napi. In delayed refill_work, it
> >> also calls napi_disable() on the receive queue's napi. This can leads to
> >> deadlock when napi_disable() is called on an already disabled napi. This
> >> scenario can be reproducible by binding a XDP socket to virtio-net
> >> interface without setting up the fill ring. As a result, try_fill_recv
> >> will fail until the fill ring is set up and refill_work is scheduled.
> >
> > So, what is the problem? The refill_work is waiting? As I know, that thread
> > will sleep some time, so the cpu can do other work.
>
> When napi_disable is called on an already disabled napi, it will sleep
> in napi_disable_locked while still holding the netdev_lock. As a result,
> later napi_enable gets stuck too as it cannot acquire the netdev_lock.
> This leads to refill_work and the pause-then-resume tx are stuck altogether.
This needs to be added to the chagelog. And it looks like this is a fix for
commit 413f0271f3966e0c73d4937963f19335af19e628
Author: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Jan 14 19:53:14 2025 -0800
net: protect NAPI enablement with netdev_lock()
?
I wonder if it's simpler to just hold the netdev lock in resize or xsk
binding instead of this.
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Quang Minh.
>
