On 2025-05-12 15:32:40-0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 5/10/25 00:54, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > Hi Shuah and Kees, > > > > On 2025-05-05 17:15:18+0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small, > > > and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace support. > > > Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more > > > convenient to use kselftest_harness.h > > > This series provides this compatibility by removing the usage of > > > problematic > > > libc features from the harness. > > > > I'd like to get this series into the next merge window. > > For that I'd like to expose it to linux-next through the nolibc tree. > > If you don't have the time for a review or issues crop up, I will drop > > the patches again. > > > > Are you fine with that? > > Didn't I respond to v13 saying you can include in your nolibc PR? > If I didn't here is my Reviewed-by.
You did ack v3. But as some patches changed, I wanted to reconfirm the new contents. > > > > The issues reported by Mark have been fixed and tests have been written > > for them. > > Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <sk...@linuxfoundation.org> Thanks! As most patches already carry your Ack, I transformed this Reviewed-by into an Acked-by for the two new patches for consistency. Thomas
