On 14.05.25 13:15, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Now that we can reliably identify PageOffline() pages that allow for
memory offlining in has_unmovable_pages(), start_isolate_page_range()
will fail on PageOffline() pages that would prevent memory offlining, and
we no longer have to detect them in scan_movable_pages() anymore.
Note that the previous mechanism relied on MEM_GOING_OFFLINE, whereby we
were not able to distinguish the types of PageOffline() before
MEM_GOING_OFFLINE.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
---
Hmm, I'm having second thoughts about this patch.
With hyper-v, I think we can hotplug partial memory blocks (e.g., 64
MiB) and online it to ZONE_MOVABLE. These blocks cannot get offlined so
far -- in contrast to virtio-mem -- and has_unmovable_pages() would not
identify that.
So probably best to keep that in for now.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
