On Fri, May 16, 2025, Dapeng Mi wrote: > On 3/25/2025 1:31 AM, Mingwei Zhang wrote: > > + if (kvm_mediated_pmu_enabled(pmu_to_vcpu(pmu))) { > > + bool allowed = check_pmu_event_filter(pmc); > > + > > + if (pmc_is_gp(pmc)) { > > + if (allowed) > > + pmc->eventsel_hw |= pmc->eventsel & > > + > > ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE; > > + else > > + pmc->eventsel_hw &= > > ~ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE; > > + } else { > > + int idx = pmc->idx - KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX; > > + > > + if (allowed) > > + pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_hw = pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl; > > Sean, just found there is a potential bug here. The > "pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_hw" should not be assigned to "pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl" > here, otherwise the other filtered fixed counter (not this allowed fixed > counter) could be enabled accidentally. > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c > index ba9d336f1d1d..f32e5f66f73b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c > @@ -473,7 +473,8 @@ static int reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc) > int idx = pmc->idx - KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX; > > if (allowed) > - pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_hw = pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl; > + pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_hw |= pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl > & > + > intel_fixed_bits_by_idx(idx, 0xf);
Hmm, I think that's fine, since pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl should have changed? But I'd rather play it safe and do (completely untested): if (pmc_is_gp(pmc)) { pmc->eventsel_hw &= ~ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE; if (allowed) pmc->eventsel_hw |= pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE; } else { u64 mask = intel_fixed_bits_by_idx(pmc->idx - KVM_FIXED_PMC_BASE_IDX, 0xf); pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_hw &= ~mask; if (allowed) pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl_hw |= pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl & mask; }