On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 03:28:47PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.05.25 20:07, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 04:12:08PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:

> > [Converting to kselftet_harness]
> > > > That'd certainly work, though doing that is more surgery on the test
> > > > than I personally have the time/enthusiasm for right now.

> > > Same over here.

> > > But probably if we touch it, we should just clean it up right away. Well,
> > > if we decide that that is the right cleanup. (you mention something like 
> > > that
> > > in your patch description :)

> > OTOH there's something to be said for just making incremental
> > improvements in the tests where we can, they tend not to get huge
> > amounts of love in general which means perfect can very much be the
> > enemy of good.  If there's some immediate prospect of someone doing a
> > bigger refactoring then that'd be amazing, but if not then it seems
> > useful to make things play better with the automation for now.

> I would agree if it would be a handful of small changes.

> But here we are already at

>  1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

Those are pretty mechanical changes due to the amount of chat from the
program rather than a more substantial reconstruction of the logic which
is rather more risky for a drive by.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to