On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:33:13AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On 2025-05-21 19:49:39+0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That seems to build with 869c788909b93a78ead1ca28c42b95eeb0779215 which > > is the current HEAD of: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git > > for-next > Thanks for testing! > To be sure, was this your full test-run? Or did you do a full test-run Just a build of the arm64 selftests (which are the only thing I build that was affected). > on linux-next in the meantime? > I'd like to get your confirmation before sending these changes to Linus. Today's -next appears to have built and be running the arm64 selftests OK again in my personal CI: https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1419721#L2482 There shoud also be results (both build and runtime) from KernelCI: https://dashboard.kernelci.org/ but there might be a bit more lag seeing the results there.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
