On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 9:21 AM Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sando...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 3:15 PM Tamir Duberstein <tam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Include all information in the panic message rather than emit fragments > > to stderr. > > Could we explain the "why" as well in the message? (i.e. not just the "what")
Sure, that would be: Include all information in the panic message rather than emit fragments to stderr to avoid possible interleaving with other output. Let me know if I should send another spin for this, or if this is ok to do on apply.
