Hi Mauro
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 at 11:34, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab+hua...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Wed, 28 May 2025 18:23:02 +0200
> Ricardo Ribalda <riba...@chromium.org> escreveu:
>
> > > +static int scatterlist_builder_add_userptr(struct scatterlist_builder
> > > *builder,
> > > + unsigned long userptr,
> > > + unsigned long length)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret;
> > > + int nents;
> > Could you initialize nents and sg_list?
> > old versions of gcc are a bit picky
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/linux-media/users/ribalda/-/jobs/77042562#L4381
>
> Please don't. In this specific case, ret is always initialized:
>
> > + struct virtio_media_sg_entry *sg_list;
> > +
> > + ret = __scatterlist_builder_add_userptr(builder, userptr, length,
> > + &sg_list, &nents);
>
> nents and sg_list may or may not be initialized at the function,
> but initializing it is wrong, as, when they are not initialized, the
> ret code shall catch it (and if not, we *do* want gcc to warn).
>
> So, if our CI is warning about that due to an old version, please upgrade
> the version at the CI runner.
The main version of gcc works fine. It is the minimal version (8.1) required by
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/changes.html
that complains.
>
> Regards,
> Mauro
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
--
Ricardo Ribalda
