On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 8:28 PM Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/29/25 12:59, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 12:19 AM Bui Quang Minh
> > <minhquangbu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Currently, in zerocopy mode with mergeable receive buffer, virtio-net
> >> does not support multi buffer but a single buffer only. This commit adds
> >> support for multi mergeable receive buffer in the zerocopy XDP path by
> >> utilizing XDP buffer with frags.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbu...@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >>   1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >> index e53ba600605a..a9558650f205 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ module_param(napi_tx, bool, 0644);
> >>   #define VIRTIO_XDP_TX          BIT(0)
> >>   #define VIRTIO_XDP_REDIR       BIT(1)
> >>
> >> +#define VIRTNET_MAX_ZC_SEGS    8
> >> +
> >>   /* RX packet size EWMA. The average packet size is used to determine the 
> >> packet
> >>    * buffer size when refilling RX rings. As the entire RX ring may be 
> >> refilled
> >>    * at once, the weight is chosen so that the EWMA will be insensitive to 
> >> short-
> >> @@ -1232,65 +1234,53 @@ static void xsk_drop_follow_bufs(struct net_device 
> >> *dev,
> >>          }
> >>   }
> >>
> >> -static int xsk_append_merge_buffer(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> >> -                                  struct receive_queue *rq,
> >> -                                  struct sk_buff *head_skb,
> >> -                                  u32 num_buf,
> >> -                                  struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr,
> >> -                                  struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> >> +static int virtnet_build_xsk_buff_mrg(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> >> +                                     struct receive_queue *rq,
> >> +                                     u32 num_buf,
> >> +                                     struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> >> +                                     struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> >>   {
> >> -       struct sk_buff *curr_skb;
> >> -       struct xdp_buff *xdp;
> >> -       u32 len, truesize;
> >> -       struct page *page;
> >> +       unsigned int len;
> >>          void *buf;
> >>
> >> -       curr_skb = head_skb;
> >> +       if (num_buf < 2)
> >> +               return 0;
> >> +
> >> +       while (num_buf > 1) {
> >> +               struct xdp_buff *new_xdp;
> >>
> >> -       while (--num_buf) {
> >>                  buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len);
> >> -               if (unlikely(!buf)) {
> >> -                       pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers out of %d 
> >> missing\n",
> >> -                                vi->dev->name, num_buf,
> >> -                                virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev,
> >> -                                                hdr->num_buffers));
> >> +               if (!unlikely(buf)) {
> >> +                       pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers missing\n",
> >> +                                vi->dev->name, num_buf);
> >>                          DEV_STATS_INC(vi->dev, rx_length_errors);
> >> -                       return -EINVAL;
> >> -               }
> >> -
> >> -               u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes, len);
> >> -
> >> -               xdp = buf_to_xdp(vi, rq, buf, len);
> >> -               if (!xdp)
> >> -                       goto err;
> >> -
> >> -               buf = napi_alloc_frag(len);
> >> -               if (!buf) {
> >> -                       xsk_buff_free(xdp);
> >> -                       goto err;
> >> +                       return -1;
> >>                  }
> >>
> >> -               memcpy(buf, xdp->data - vi->hdr_len, len);
> >> -
> >> -               xsk_buff_free(xdp);
> >> +               new_xdp = buf_to_xdp(vi, rq, buf, len);
> >> +               if (!new_xdp)
> >> +                       goto drop_bufs;
> >>
> >> -               page = virt_to_page(buf);
> >> +               /* In virtnet_add_recvbuf_xsk(), we ask the host to fill 
> >> from
> >> +                * xdp->data - vi->hdr_len with both virtio_net_hdr and 
> >> data.
> >> +                * However, only the first packet has the virtio_net_hdr, 
> >> the
> >> +                * following ones do not. So we need to adjust the 
> >> following
> > Typo here.
>
> I'm sorry, could you clarify which word contains the typo?
>
> >
> >> +                * packets' data pointer to the correct place.
> >> +                */
> > I wonder what happens if we don't use this trick? I meant we don't
> > reuse the header room for the virtio-net header. This seems to be fine
> > for a mergeable buffer and can help to reduce the trick.
>
> I don't think using the header room for virtio-net header creates this
> case handling. In my opinion, it comes from the slightly difference in
> the recvbuf between single buffer and multi-buffer. When we have n
> single-buffer packets, each buffer will have its own virtio-net header.
> But when we have 1 multi-buffer packet (which spans across n buffers),
> only the first buffer has virtio-net header, the following buffers do not.
>
> There 2 important pointers here. The pointer we announce to the vhost
> side to fill the data, let's call it announced_addr, and xdp_buff->data
> which is expected to point the the start of Ethernet frame. Currently,
>
>      announced_addr = xdp_buff->data - hdr_len
>
> The host side will write the virtio-net header to announced_addr then
> the Ethernet frame's data in the first buffer. In case of multi-buffer
> packet, in the following buffers, host side writes the Ethernet frame's
> data to the announced_addr no virtio-net header. So in the virtio-net,
> we need to subtract xdp_buff->data, otherwise, we lose some Ethernet
> frame's data.
>
> I think a slightly better solution is that we set announced_addr =
> xdp_buff->data then we only need to xdp_buff->data += hdr_len for the
> first buffer and do need to adjust xdp_buff->data of the following buffers.

Exactly my point.

>
> >
> >> +               new_xdp->data -= vi->hdr_len;
> >> +               new_xdp->data_end = new_xdp->data + len;
> >>
> >> -               truesize = len;
> >> +               if (!xsk_buff_add_frag(xdp, new_xdp))
> >> +                       goto drop_bufs;
> >>
> >> -               curr_skb  = virtnet_skb_append_frag(head_skb, curr_skb, 
> >> page,
> >> -                                                   buf, len, truesize);
> >> -               if (!curr_skb) {
> >> -                       put_page(page);
> >> -                       goto err;
> >> -               }
> >> +               num_buf--;
> >>          }
> >>
> >>          return 0;
> >>
> >> -err:
> >> +drop_bufs:
> >>          xsk_drop_follow_bufs(vi->dev, rq, num_buf, stats);
> >> -       return -EINVAL;
> >> +       return -1;
> >>   }
> >>
> >>   static struct sk_buff *virtnet_receive_xsk_merge(struct net_device *dev, 
> >> struct virtnet_info *vi,
> >> @@ -1307,23 +1297,42 @@ static struct sk_buff 
> >> *virtnet_receive_xsk_merge(struct net_device *dev, struct
> >>          num_buf = virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers);
> >>
> >>          ret = XDP_PASS;
> >> +       if (virtnet_build_xsk_buff_mrg(vi, rq, num_buf, xdp, stats))
> >> +               goto drop;
> >> +
> >>          rcu_read_lock();
> >>          prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog);
> >> -       /* TODO: support multi buffer. */
> >> -       if (prog && num_buf == 1)
> >> -               ret = virtnet_xdp_handler(prog, xdp, dev, xdp_xmit, stats);
> > Without this patch it looks like we had a bug:
> >
> >          ret = XDP_PASS;
> >          rcu_read_lock();
> >          prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog);
> >          /* TODO: support multi buffer. */
> >          if (prog && num_buf == 1)
> >                  ret = virtnet_xdp_handler(prog, xdp, dev, xdp_xmit, stats);
> >          rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > This implies if num_buf is greater than 1, we will assume XDP_PASS?
>
> Yes, I think XDP_DROP should be returned in that case.

Care to post a patch and cc stable?

>
> >
> >> +       if (prog) {
> >> +               /* We are in zerocopy mode so we cannot copy the 
> >> multi-buffer
> >> +                * xdp buff to a single linear xdp buff. If we do so, in 
> >> case
> >> +                * the BPF program decides to redirect to a XDP socket 
> >> (XSK),
> >> +                * it will trigger the zerocopy receive logic in XDP 
> >> socket.
> >> +                * The receive logic thinks it receives zerocopy buffer 
> >> while
> >> +                * in fact, it is the copy one and everything is messed up.
> >> +                * So just drop the packet here if we have a multi-buffer 
> >> xdp
> >> +                * buff and the BPF program does not support it.
> >> +                */
> >> +               if (xdp_buff_has_frags(xdp) && !prog->aux->xdp_has_frags)
> >> +                       ret = XDP_DROP;
> > Could we move the check before trying to build a multi-buffer XDP buff?
>
> Yes, I'll fix this in next version.
>
> >
> >> +               else
> >> +                       ret = virtnet_xdp_handler(prog, xdp, dev, xdp_xmit,
> >> +                                                 stats);
> >> +       }
> >>          rcu_read_unlock();
> >>
> >>          switch (ret) {
> >>          case XDP_PASS:
> >> -               skb = xsk_construct_skb(rq, xdp);
> >> +               skb = xdp_build_skb_from_zc(xdp);
> > Is this better to make this change a separate patch?
>
> Okay, I'll create a separate patch to convert the current XDP_PASS
> handler to use xdp_build_skb_from_zc helper.

That would be better.

>
> >
> >>                  if (!skb)
> >> -                       goto drop_bufs;
> >> +                       break;
> >>
> >> -               if (xsk_append_merge_buffer(vi, rq, skb, num_buf, hdr, 
> >> stats)) {
> >> -                       dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> >> -                       goto drop;
> >> -               }
> >> +               /* Later, in virtnet_receive_done(), eth_type_trans()
> >> +                * is called. However, in xdp_build_skb_from_zc(), it is 
> >> called
> >> +                * already. As a result, we need to reset the data to 
> >> before
> >> +                * the mac header so that the later call in
> >> +                * virtnet_receive_done() works correctly.
> >> +                */
> >> +               skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> >>
> >>                  return skb;
> >>
> >> @@ -1332,14 +1341,11 @@ static struct sk_buff 
> >> *virtnet_receive_xsk_merge(struct net_device *dev, struct
> >>                  return NULL;
> >>
> >>          default:
> >> -               /* drop packet */
> >> -               xsk_buff_free(xdp);
> >> +               break;
> >>          }
> >>
> >> -drop_bufs:
> >> -       xsk_drop_follow_bufs(dev, rq, num_buf, stats);
> >> -
> >>   drop:
> >> +       xsk_buff_free(xdp);
> >>          u64_stats_inc(&stats->drops);
> >>          return NULL;
> >>   }
> >> @@ -1396,6 +1402,8 @@ static int virtnet_add_recvbuf_xsk(struct 
> >> virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue
> >>                  return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >>          len = xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size(pool) + vi->hdr_len;
> >> +       /* Reserve some space for skb_shared_info */
> >> +       len -= SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> >>
> >>          for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
> >>                  /* Use the part of XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM as the virtnet hdr 
> >> space.
> >> @@ -6734,6 +6742,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >>          dev->netdev_ops = &virtnet_netdev;
> >>          dev->stat_ops = &virtnet_stat_ops;
> >>          dev->features = NETIF_F_HIGHDMA;
> >> +       dev->xdp_zc_max_segs = VIRTNET_MAX_ZC_SEGS;
> >>
> >>          dev->ethtool_ops = &virtnet_ethtool_ops;
> >>          SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &vdev->dev);
> >> --
> >> 2.43.0
> >>
> > Thanks
> >
>

Thanks


Reply via email to