Hi Sebastian, Thanks in advance.
> On 5 Jun 2025, at 10:36, Sebastian Ott <seb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Some small fixes for arch_timer_edge_cases that I stumbled upon > while debugging failures for this selftest on ampere-one. > I’ve tested this test under three circumstances: 1) Original (!HAS_EL2 && !HAS_EL2_E2H0) 2) HAS_EL2 && HAS_EL2_E2H0 3) HAS_EL2 && !HAS_EL2_E2H0 Tests 1) and 2) returned in approx. the same amount of real time (about 12s) although 3) doesn’t seem to return at all. I’ve tested it on ampere-one. Miguel > Changes since v1: > * determine effective counter width based on suggestions from Marc > Changes since v2: > * new patch to fix xval initialization > > I've done tests with this on various machines - no issues during > several hundreds of test runs. > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20250509143312.34224-1-seb...@redhat.com/ > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20250527142434.25209-1-seb...@redhat.com/ > > Sebastian Ott (4): > KVM: arm64: selftests: fix help text for arch_timer_edge_cases > KVM: arm64: selftests: fix thread migration in arch_timer_edge_cases > KVM: arm64: selftests: arch_timer_edge_cases - fix xval init > KVM: arm64: selftests: arch_timer_edge_cases - determine effective counter > width > > .../kvm/arm64/arch_timer_edge_cases.c | 39 ++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > base-commit: 0ff41df1cb268fc69e703a08a57ee14ae967d0ca > -- > 2.49.0 > >
