On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 02:06:53PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Marking PMDs that map a "normal" refcounted folios as special is
> against our rules documented for vm_normal_page().
>
> Fortunately, there are not that many pmd_special() check that can be
> mislead, and most vm_normal_page_pmd()/vm_normal_folio_pmd() users that
> would get this wrong right now are rather harmless: e.g., none so far
> bases decisions whether to grab a folio reference on that decision.
>
> Well, and GUP-fast will fallback to GUP-slow. All in all, so far no big
> implications as it seems.
>
> Getting this right will get more important as we use
> folio_normal_page_pmd() in more places.
>
> Fix it by teaching insert_pfn_pmd() to properly handle folios and
> pfns -- moving refcount/mapcount/etc handling in there, renaming it to
> insert_pmd(), and distinguishing between both cases using a new simple
> "struct folio_or_pfn" structure.
>
> Use folio_mk_pmd() to create a pmd for a folio cleanly.
>
> Fixes: 6c88f72691f8 ("mm/huge_memory: add vmf_insert_folio_pmd()")
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@nvidia.com>
Jason
