On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 06:51:21AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:39:43 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > FWIW you can steal bpftrace integration from this series:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250421222827.283737-22-k...@kernel.org/
> >
> > Yes, that would be great. I think we can iterate until we hit the poll
> > path, otherwise we skip the test at timeout. Something as:
> >
> > while (true):
> > send msg
> > if netpoll_poll_dev() was invoked:
> > ksft_exit
> >
> > if timeout:
> > raise KsftSkipEx
> >
> > As soon as your code lands, I will adapt the test to do so. Meanwhile,
> > I will send the v1 for the netpoll, and later we can iterate.
> >
> > Thanks for working on this bfptrace helper. This will be useful on other
> > usecases as well.
>
> Right, you're the second person I pointed that patch out to. Would be
> great if someone could steal that patch and make it a part of their
> series so that it gets merged
I can do that. I was expecting your patches to be landed, and then
I would reuse it. I was not expecting to ship it as part of my patchset.
So, the selftest for netpoll is already in the mailing list[1], so, we
have two options, now:
1) Steal your patch and make [1] depend on it.
2) Merge the selftest [1] and, then, steal your patch by adding the
bpftrace support in it.
What is your recommendation?
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250620-netpoll_test-v1-1-5068832f7...@debian.org/
[1]
Thanks,
--breno
