On 6/23/25 6:44 PM, Luca Weiss wrote: > On 23-06-2025 2:39 p.m., Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 6/21/25 3:19 PM, Luca Weiss wrote: >>> Due to historical reasons all msm8974 boards have used the CX power rail >>> as regulator instead of going through the power domain framework. >>> >>> Since rpmpd has gained msm8974 support quite a bit ago, let's start >>> using it and replace all usages of pm8841_s2 (CX), pm8841_s4 (GFX) and >>> for the boards using pma8084 pma8084_s2 (CX), pma8084_s7 (GFX). >>> >>> For reference, downstream is using GFX power rail as parent-supply for >>> mmcc's OXILI_GDSC GDSC which then is used for GPU, but nothing there is >>> modelled upstream. >> >> if you use an opp table with described rpmpd levels and bind the GFX >> domain to gpucc, it should propagate - check it out > > I don't *really* understand what you mean here. I'd be happy if you provided > an example (or better yet, a patch) for this.
sm6115 > > Also msm8974 does not have gpucc, only gcc and mmcc. *oh*... right You would then have to somehow selectively bind the OXILI_GDSC to VDD_GX, for which I don't know if we have a good interface today.. Konrad
