On 25.06.25 10:49, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
David, are you planning a v2 of this soon? If so I'll hold off review until then, if not I can get stuck in when I have time?
There will probably be a v1 called "mm: vm_normal_page*()" where I drop the problematic bit, and respin the problematic bit as a new RFC once I have a better understanding.
So, no need to review right now. -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
