On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 11:27 PM Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 10:28:33AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 1:05 AM Mathieu Poirier > > <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 02:26:44PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > > > > Add call rproc_coredump_set_elf_info() to initialize the elf info for > > > > coredump, otherwise coredump will report an error "ELF class is not > > > > set". > > > > > > > > Remove the DSP IRAM and DRAM segment in coredump list, because after > > > > stop, DSP power is disabled, the IRAM and DRAM can't be accessed. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.w...@nxp.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 6 +++--- > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c > > > > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c > > > > index 9b9cddb224b0..9e7efb77b6e5 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c > > > > @@ -738,9 +738,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout(struct > > > > imx_dsp_rproc *priv) > > > > mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, (void __force *)cpu_addr, > > > > (dma_addr_t)att->sa, > > > > att->size, da, NULL, NULL, > > > > "dsp_mem"); > > > > > > > > - if (mem) > > > > - rproc_coredump_add_segment(rproc, da, att->size); > > > > - else > > > > + if (!mem) > > > > > > Flag rproc->recovery_disabled is never set to true, meaning that since > > > this > > > driver was introduced, some kind of recovery was available. > > > > Actually since this driver was introduced, the recovery can't work. > > We didn't test the recovery function before. sorry for the mistake. > > Let me see if I get this right: > > (1) Almost 5 years ago you sent me a driver with code you did not test.
Driver was tested but missed the recovery/coredump function. > (2) It took all this time to realize and fix the problem. I just realized that the recovery/coredump is one of the functions supported by remoteproc. > (3) I should trust that, this time, you have tested your code. recovery/coredump has been tested. Best regards Shengjiu Wang > > Did I understand all that correctly? > > > > > > > > > I worry that your work will introduce regression for other users. Daniel > > > and > > > Iuliana, once again have to ask you to look at this patchset. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mathieu > > > > > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > > > > > rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > > > > @@ -1203,6 +1201,8 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_probe(struct > > > > platform_device *pdev) > > > > goto err_detach_domains; > > > > } > > > > > > > > + rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_XTENSA); > > > > + > > > > pm_runtime_enable(dev); > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > -- > > > > 2.34.1 > > > > > > >
