From: Li RongQing <[email protected]> The original commit be2ff42c5d6e ("fuse: Use hash table to link processing request") converted fuse_pqueue->processing to a hash table, but virtio_fs_enqueue_req() was not updated to use it correctly. So use fuse_pqueue->processing as a hash table, this make the code more coherent
Co-developed-by: Fushuai Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <[email protected]> --- fs/fuse/dev.c | 1 + fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c index e80cd8f..4659bc8 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ unsigned int fuse_req_hash(u64 unique) { return hash_long(unique & ~FUSE_INT_REQ_BIT, FUSE_PQ_HASH_BITS); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_req_hash); /* * A new request is available, wake fiq->waitq diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c index b8a99d3..d050470 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c +++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include <linux/cleanup.h> #include <linux/uio.h> #include "fuse_i.h" +#include "fuse_dev_i.h" /* Used to help calculate the FUSE connection's max_pages limit for a request's * size. Parts of the struct fuse_req are sliced into scattergather lists in @@ -1382,7 +1383,7 @@ static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq, unsigned int out_sgs = 0; unsigned int in_sgs = 0; unsigned int total_sgs; - unsigned int i; + unsigned int i, hash; int ret; bool notify; struct fuse_pqueue *fpq; @@ -1442,8 +1443,9 @@ static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq, /* Request successfully sent. */ fpq = &fsvq->fud->pq; + hash = fuse_req_hash(req->in.h.unique); spin_lock(&fpq->lock); - list_add_tail(&req->list, fpq->processing); + list_add_tail(&req->list, &fpq->processing[hash]); spin_unlock(&fpq->lock); set_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags); /* matches barrier in request_wait_answer() */ -- 2.9.4
