On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 04:42:13PM +0200, Casey Connolly wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> > > > b/drivers/pmdomain/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> > > > index
> > > > 078323b85b5648e33dd89e08cf31bdc5ab76d553..e09552a469264f28952fc46c3ab8c125e87310da
> > > > 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pmdomain/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> > > > @@ -217,6 +217,24 @@ static struct rpmhpd gmxc = {
> > > > .res_name = "gmxc.lvl",
> > > > };
> > > > +/* Milos RPMH powerdomains */
> > >
> > > I can't find any public docs telling us which SoC is Milos (the only
> > > relevant result is Bjorn's email asking you to use that name instead of
> > > SM7635). So for the sake of future generations could you reference both
> > > names in a comment somewhere? Or even the commit message would be enough
> > > tbh.
> >
> > I don't know the full list of model numbers for Milos. I assume it's
> > SM7635, SM6650, SM6650P, QCM6690 and QCS6690 based on the info I could
> > fine, but such info is hard to get. So this is not a definite list that
> > all those are actually Milos, or that this is the full list of Milos
> > chipsets.
>
> oof, I see... that complicates things. It sure would be good if this list
> was documented in the kernel though imo.
Kernel is not the place to store mappings or descriptions of some random
company products and their names, so no.
Also it's not a task of contributor of a new SoC to decipher Qualcomm
model numbering and document it anywhere.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
