On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:45:48AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > From: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> > > The FSF does not reside in the Franklin street anymore. Let's update > the address with the link to their website, as suggested in the latest > revisions of their licenses. > (See https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt for example) > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> > --- > LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0 | 6 +++--- > LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 | 10 ++++------ > LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0 | 5 ++--- > LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 | 8 ++++---- > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0 b/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0 > index 3a4fa969e4c29..8d0a75431f06d 100644 > --- a/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0 > +++ b/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0 > @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ License-Text: > Version 1, February 1989 > > Copyright (C) 1989 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > - 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA > + <https://fsf.org/> > +
Nit, this change, differs from this one: > --- a/LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 > +++ b/LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 > @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ License-Text: > GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE > Version 2, June 1991 > > - Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > - 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 > USA > + Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc., > + <https://fsf.org/> > Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies > of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. > Ah, wait, that's what the FSF did on their site, ugh. How about make this 4 patches, one for each file, include a link to where each of the changes came from (you only have one link in the changelog.) Just to be explicit here. thanks, greg k-h
