On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 10:00:31AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > clock_nanosleep() returns a positive error value. Unlike other libc > functions it *does not* return -1 nor set errno. > > Fix the return value and also adapt nanosleep().
Good catch, I wasn't aware of this either!
> Fixes: 7c02bc4088af ("tools/nolibc: add support for clock_nanosleep() and
> nanosleep()")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
Willy
