On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:52:05 +0530 Dev Jain <dev.j...@arm.com> wrote: > > On 26/08/25 12:37 pm, Dev Jain wrote: > > This patchset ensures that the number of hugepages is correctly set in the > > system so that the uffd-stress test does not fail due to the racy nature of > > the test. Patch 1 corrects the hugepage constraint in the run_vmtests.sh > > script, whereas patch 2 corrects the constraint in the test itself. > > > > Dev Jain (2): > > selftests/mm/uffd-stress: Make test operate on less hugetlb memory > > selftests/mm/uffd-stress: Stricten constraint on free hugepages before > > the test > > > > tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +- > > tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Hi Andrew, > > I wanted to make a v2 of this series to replace 10 with min(32, nrcpus - 1)
That sounds line a one-line change? Send a one-line change ;) > (see computation of nr_parallel in uffd-stress.c) but I see that it has > been pulled into mm-new, and on top of that, the following patch makes > things complicated to just revert my commits in mm-new and make v2 on top of > that - > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250830033424.8c44fc4c...@smtp.kernel.org/ > > So shall I just send a new separate patch based off mm-new? Or just resend the whole series based on mainline or something?
