On Sat 2008-02-02 20:38:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It would have been easier to just use the public interface and
> > > hard-wire "rtc0". But going directly to the hardware was dirtier,
> > > and more in the spirit of "hack that obviously shouldn't go upstream
> > > until it gets done properly".
> >
> > Yes, it was "quick and dirty". And I do not think it is going upstream
> > in this form...?
>
> which would be a pity - this thing _almost_ started doing suspend and
> resume cycles on my testsystems, all by itself :-)
...which is good reason for me to create cleaned-up patch, right?
wakeup in .c now works, so I actually have time to do it now.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
