On Jan 4, 2008 4:19 PM, Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Umm... Actually, m_next() and m_stop() both appear to be too convoluted. > > * m_next() never gets v == NULL > * the only reason why we do that mmput et.al. both from ->next() and > ->stop() is that we try to avoid having priv->mm; why bother? > * why the _hell_ is proc_maps_private defined in include/linux/proc_fs.h, > of all places? > * while we are at it, why is it in any header at all? Having that sucker > in task_mmu.c and task_nommu.c would be more than enough (and we'd avoid > that ifdef in definition, while we are at it). > > How about this:
Hi Al, Any update on this patch? As you completely rewrote it, I thought you would take care of pushing it forward. Thanks. -- Guillaume -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
