On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:31:10 -0800 (PST) Alex Dubov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Alex Dubov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> --- mspro_block.c.orig        2008-02-04 15:25:16.000000000 +1100
> +++ mspro_block.c     2008-02-04 15:26:28.226886699 +1100
> @@ -668,20 +668,13 @@
> 
>               spin_lock_irqsave(&msb->q_lock, flags);
>               if (rc >= 0)
> -                     chunk = end_that_request_chunk(req, 1, rc);
> +                     chunk = __blk_end_request(req, 0, rc);
>               else
> -                     chunk = end_that_request_first(req, rc,
> -                                                    req->current_nr_sectors);
> +                     chunk = __blk_end_request(req, rc, 0);
> 
>               dev_dbg(&card->dev, "end chunk %d, %d\n", rc, chunk);
> -             if (!chunk) {
> -                     add_disk_randomness(req->rq_disk);
> -                     blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
> -                     end_that_request_last(req, rc > 0 ? 1 : rc);
> -             }
>               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msb->q_lock, flags);
>       } while (chunk);
> -
>  }
> 
>  static int mspro_block_has_request(struct mspro_block_data *msb)
> 

Thanks.  However please do prepare patches in `patch -p1' form.

Could you please fix the build error in the code in 2.6.24-mm1?

I part-fixed it (then disabled it) with this:

--- a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c~a
+++ a/drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c
@@ -1233,11 +1232,12 @@ static int mspro_block_resume(struct mem
        unsigned long flags;
        int rc = 0;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_MEMSTICK_UNSAFE_RESUME
+#if defined(CONFIG_MEMSTICK_UNSAFE_RESUME) && 0
 
        struct mspro_block_data *new_msb;
        struct memstick_host *host = card->host;
-       struct mspro_sys_attr s_attr, r_attr;
+       struct mspro_sys_attr *s_attr;
+       struct mspro_sys_attr *r_attr;
        unsigned char cnt;
 
        mutex_lock(&host->lock);
_

see, this:

                s_attr = container_of(new_msb->attr_group.attrs[cnt],
                                      struct mspro_sys_attr,
                                      dev_attr);

is broken.  Attribute groups hold `struct attribute' but this code thinks
they hold `struct device_attribute'.  I could bodge it to compile cleanly,
but I don't know if it will work.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to